CTEM Lifecycle · 05

Reporting & Analytics

Zafran gives CISOs a board-ready exposure map and gives operators the SLA, MTTR and trend analytics behind it. Every number carries its validation evidence and timestamp, so reports are audit-ready without a spreadsheet exercise.

Get a Demo
01ContinuousDiscovery &Detection02Assess &Validate03RiskMitigation04RemediationWorkflows05Reporting &AnalyticsAgenticExposureManagement

Capabilities

How Zafran Enables Reporting & Analytics

Board-ready exposure reporting with validation evidence, SLA tracking and trend analytics.

Cap 1

Exposure trend over time

Validated exposure, mitigated exposure and remediation throughput by month, business unit and asset class.

Cap 2

Board-ready exposure map

Where exploitable exposure sits across the business and how much is already covered by controls.

Cap 3

SLA and MTTR tracking

SLA adherence, mean time to mitigate and mean time to remediate by team and severity.

Cap 4

Audit-ready evidence

Each closed exposure lists what was validated, which control or patch resolved it, by whom and when.

Workflow

How it works

  1. 01

    Collect evidence as work happens

    Validation results, mitigations and remediation tickets are timestamped in the Exposure Graph automatically.

  2. 02

    Roll up to business context

    Exposure aggregates by business unit, asset criticality and owner, not by scanner.

  3. 03

    Report to any audience

    Board views, auditor evidence packs and operator dashboards come from the same data.

Compare

Zafran vs. the alternatives

Zafran runs the whole lifecycle on one Exposure Graph; alternatives cover a slice of it.

CapabilityZafranSpreadsheet & BI reportingScanner-native dashboards
Reports validated exploitability, not raw CVE counts
Evidence and timestamps per closed exposure
SLA and MTTR by owner and business unit
Includes mitigations via existing controls
Cross-scanner, cross-cloud rollups
Board-ready output without manual assembly
Yes Partial NoIllustrative; final rows per stage TBD with PMM

Proof

What customers see

1 source
for board, audit and operator reporting
100%
of closed exposures carry validation evidence and a timestamp
F500
insurer runs board reporting on a Zafran exposure map

“Zafran lets us evaluate the effectiveness and ROI of our security stack against what is actually exploitable.”

Dave Estlick
CISO, Chipotle

Related

Where this fits

FAQ

Reporting & Analytics: questions buyers ask

What should a CTEM report show the board?

Validated exploitable exposure by business unit, how much of it is already mitigated by existing controls, trend over time, and SLA performance. Zafran produces this view directly from the Exposure Graph rather than from exported CVE counts.

How does Zafran track vulnerability SLAs?

Each validated exposure gets an SLA based on exploitability and asset criticality. Zafran measures time to mitigate and time to remediate against it, and reports adherence and aging by owner, team and severity.

What evidence does Zafran provide for audits and cyber insurance?

For every closed exposure: the validation result, the control or patch that resolved it, the approver, and timestamps. Evidence exports as an audit pack without manual assembly.

Can Zafran report on mitigations, not only patches?

Yes. Exposures closed by compensating controls are reported alongside patched ones, with residual risk shown separately, so the board sees real exposure reduction rather than patch counts.

How is Zafran reporting different from scanner dashboards or a BI tool?

Scanner dashboards count their own findings; BI tools need someone to merge and maintain exports. Zafran reports on de-duplicated, validated exposure across every source, with the evidence attached.

See Zafran in Action

Prioritize and fix what is truly exploitable using risk context from your existing security tools.

Get a DemoFree Trial
WireframeSitemap